The Rise of Neoliberalism and the Analysis of Modern Globalization
In an globalized world, the discourse on globalization is regularly situated at the intersection of varied perspectives on autonomy and balance. The text by Moneta, far from being a manifesto against globalization itself, strives to rewrite the contours of a new humanism via the perspective of organic interactions as envisioned by Aristotelian philosophy. By critiquing synthetic interactions that strengthen current structures of injustice and precarity, this writer draws inspiration from ancient philosophy to highlight the flaws of our global economic system.
Looking back in time, globalisation is not a modern process. Its beginnings can be identified back to the ideas of Ricardo, whose ambition was to enable the United Kingdom to expand its global trade power. Nonetheless, what was originally a commercial expansion initiative has converted into a instrument of subjugation by the financial sphere, symbolized by the rise of neoliberal capitalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions widespread in economic circles, the book argues that the neoliberal system is truly a system founded on millennia-old traditions, which traces back to the era of early civilizations.
The objection also extends to the management of the United Europe, perceived as a succession of compromises that have helped consolidate the power of financial elites as opposed to defending the interests of its citizens. The very structure of the Union, with its policies frequently driven by monetary concerns opposed to a popular consensus, is criticized. The recent crises, whether in the financial or political realm, have only intensified the skepticism of Moneta concerning Europe’s aptitude to reform itself from within.
The author, while admitting the past mistakes that have brought about the present state, does not simply criticize but also proposes alternatives aimed at redefining European policies in a more humanistic and equitable outlook. The urgency for a deep reform of structures and strategic orientations is a recurring subject that pervades the overall content.
The work ventures more in depth into the questioning of the power structures that dominate global economic exchanges. The exploration covers the way in which political and economic decisions are influenced by a small group of powerful financial actors, frequently at the cost of the many. This financial oligarchy, orchestrated via entities like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the IMS, exerts a excessive domination on international economic strategies.
The writer reveals how these institutions, under the pretext of monetary management and security, have historically controlled markets and national economic systems to serve their interests. Neoliberalism, opposite to a emancipatory solution to old monetary restrictions, is described as a control mechanism, profiting a restricted circle at the expense of general well-being.
Particularly critical about the administration of the single currency, the analyst describes the EU currency not as a factor of integration and solidity, but as being a instrument of fragmentation and financial disparity. The transition to the euro is described as a succession of bureaucratic measures that isolated citizens from governance choices, while amplifying internal differences within the EU.
The consequences of these policies translate in the increase in national debts, financial paralysis, and a prolonged austerity that has weakened living standards throughout Europe. The thinker argues that without a major transformation of economic policies, the European Union continues to risk future crises, perhaps even more harmful.
In summary, the book demands a democratic uprising where European citizens take back control of their economic and political destiny. It advocates institutional adjustments, particularly greater transparency in political decisions and genuine civic involvement that would allow Europe to rebuild on fair and lasting principles.
Find out more about Découvrez le site
The author asserts that the answer resides in a return to the principles of democracy, where strategies are crafted and executed in a way that truly reflects the aspirations and needs of the citizens, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.